Death Note, Vol. 1

Death Note, Vol. 1
By:Tsugumi Ohba
Published on 2011-05-25 by VIZ Media LLC

Light tests the boundaries of the Death Note's powers as L and the police begin to close in. Luckily Light's father is the head of the Japanese National Police Agency and leaves vital information about the case lying around the house. With access to his father's files, Light can keep one step ahead of the authorities. But who is the strange man following him, and how can Light guard against enemies whose names he doesn't know? -- VIZ Media

This Book was ranked at 9 by Google Books for keyword Anime.

Book ID of Death Note, Vol. 1's Books is pYLwAQAAQBAJ, Book which was written byTsugumi Ohbahave ETAG "gVjpAvgeVCY"

Book which was published by VIZ Media LLC since 2011-05-25 have ISBNs, ISBN 13 Code is 9781421543659 and ISBN 10 Code is 1421543656

Reading Mode in Text Status is true and Reading Mode in Image Status is true

Book which have "195 Pages" is Printed at BOOK under CategoryComics and Graphic Novels

This Book was rated by 2 Raters and have average rate at "5.0"

This eBook Maturity (Adult Book) status is NOT_MATURE

Book was written in en

eBook Version Availability Status at PDF is and in ePub is

Book Preview

Do not you sort of loathe how we've entered the decadent stage of Goodreads whereby perhaps fifty percent (or more) of the reviews written by non-teenagers and non-romancers are now bare and unabashed inside their variously successful attempts at being arch, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Do not you sort of pine (secretly, in the marrow of your gut's merry druthers) for the great ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all reviews were uniformly plainspoke Do not you type of hate how we've entered the decadent period of Goodreads when perhaps fifty % (or more) of the opinions written by non-teenagers and non-romancers are now naked and unabashed within their variously successful attempts at being posture, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you kind of maple (secretly, in the marrow of one's gut's merry druthers) for the nice ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all reviews were uniformly plainspoken, simply practical, unpretentious, and -- above all else -- boring, boring, dull? Don't you type of loathe when persons state'don't you believe in this manner or feel that way'in an attempt to goad you both psychologically and grammatically in to accepting together? In the words of ABBA: I really do, I do, I do(, I really do, I do). Properly, because the interwebs is a world where yesteryear stands shoulder-to-shoulder with the current (and with fetish porn), we can revisit the past in their inviolable presentness any time we wish. Or at least until this website eventually tanks. Consider (won't you?) Matt Nieberle's review of Macbeth in its entirety. I have destined it with a heavy string and dragged it here for your perusal. (Please recognize that several a sic are intended in the following reviews.) their really complex and foolish! why cant we be examining like Romeo and Juliet?!?! at least that book is excellent! There you have it. Refreshingly, not just a review published in one of many witch's comments or alluding to Hillary and Bill Clinton or discussing the reviewer's first period. Just a primal shout unleashed into the black wilderness of the cosmos.Yes, Mr. Nieberle is (probably) an adolescent, but I admire his ability to strongarm the temptation to be clever or ironic. (Don't you?) He speaks the native language of the idk generation with an economy and an understanding that renders his convictions all the more emphatic. Here's MICHAEL's overview of exactly the same play. You may'know'MICHAEL; he's the'Problems Architect'only at Goodreads. (A problematic title itself in that it implies that he designs problems... which can be the case, for several I know.) This book shouldn't be required reading... reading plays that you do not want to learn is awful. Reading a play kinda sucks to start with, if it was meant to be read, then it would be a novel, not just a play. Along with that the teach had us students browse the play aloud (on person for every character for a few pages). None folks had read the play before. None people wanted to read it (I made the mistake of taking the'easy'english class for 6 years). The teacher picked students that appeared to be they weren't paying attention. All this compounded to create me more or less hate reading classics for something like 10 years (granted macbeth alone wasn't the problem). I also hate iambic pentameter. Pure activism there. STOP the mandatory reading of plays. It's wrong, morally and academically. And it also can really fuck up your GPA. There's no wasteful extravagance in this editorial... no fanfare, no fireworks, no linked photos of half-naked, oiled-up, big-bosomed starlets, no invented dialogues between mcdougal and the review-writer. It's simple and memorable. Being required to see plays is wrong, and if you require anyone, under duress, to learn a play then you have sinned and will hell, in the event that you rely on hell. Or even, you're likely to the DMV. I am also fed up with all you could smug spelling snobs. You damnable fascists with your new-fangled dictionaries and your fancy-schmancy spell check. Sometimes the passionate immediacy of an email overcomes its spelling limitations. Also, in this age when we are taught to respect each other's differences, it appears offensively egocentric and mean-spirited you may anticipate others tokowtow in your small linguistic rules. Artistic manifestation can no cost alone regardless of how you try in order to shackle it. That's the signal, Aubrey. Around my own opinion, the play Macbeth had been the worste peice ever compiled by Shakespeare, this says a lot looking at i also read through his Romeo along with Juliet. Ontop involving it is witout a doubt incredible plot, unrealistic characters and absolutly discusting range of ethics, Shakespeare overtly molds Female Macbeth as being the accurate vilian inside the play. Looking at the girl with mearly your speech throughout the spine rounded and also Macbeth herself is truely enacting the actual ugly criminal activity, like killing along with fraud, I do not realize why it is so quick to assume in which Macbeth would probably be ready to complete good as opposed to unpleasant only when her girl ended up being more possitive. I believe until this perform can be uterally unrealistic. Nonetheless the following is definitely this ne plus super of classic e-book reviewing. Whilst succinct and also without the drawing attention interest to be able to coyness or perhaps cuteness, Jo's evaluate alludes with a anger therefore outstanding it's inexpressible. One particular imagines a couple of Signet Basic Features compromised to chunks by using pruning shears inside Jo's vicinity. I detest this play. A case in point in which Could not perhaps present you with any kind of analogies or perhaps similes as to simply how much I personally despise it. A good incrementally snarkier style will often have stated one thing like...'I dispise the following participate in just like a simile Could not surface with.' Certainly not Jo. The girl speaks a live, undecorated truth of the matter unsuitable for figurative language. And there's certainly no problem by using that. Once inside an incredible when, when you get neck-deep with dandified pomo hijinks, it can be a good wallow within the pig dog pen you're itchin'for. Appreciate it, Jo. I really like your useless clasping on similes in which are unable to approach the bilious hatred with your heart. You might be my verizon prepaid phone, along with We are yours. Figuratively speaking, regarding course. And from now on the following is this assessment: Macbeth through Bill Shakespeare is a good literary do the job within the English language language, plus anybody who disagrees is undoubtedly an asshole including a dumbhead.